A thought about wording and the message it sends:
For the listed cause of the censorship, "sexualization of underage high school girls" is written in quotes. In context, and with the common usage of "air quotes", it seems to imply some authorial bias that the reason for the censorship is invalid. The worst case interpretation of this kind of writing is that censorship wiki's writers are perverts. That is a terrible message to send.
Opinions are for the message boards. This is a wiki and writers should strive for the most neutral tone possible, such that all audiences can get information here without any fuss.
I am not suggesting to remove the quotes, as they demonstrate the word for word justification used and thus provide clear information. It should be recontextualized to avoid any suggestion of bias. I'll take a crack at it but I figured I ought to at least explain the change and give food for thought to other editors. 172.58.130.170 01:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is a good rationale. Quotes can be used validly if quoting from a source, but in this case, no source or reference link was given. —Pippinitis (talk) 07:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)